返回列表 发帖

2010四年防务展望(QDR)专题

《2010四年防务展望》定于2月1日正式公布。
列举一些目前已透露信息:
1)正式放弃应付两场局部战争策略。
2)重点转向应付非对称作战、反IED、反介入、空间防御、网络防御。
3)海军空军合作海空一体战倡议。
4)加强电子战。
5)扩充战地无人机武装巡逻次数。
3)国防部出台具体政策保护维持国防工业基地。
4)开发高渗透高持续性ISR/打击平台。
5)开发敏捷性全球打击平台。
6)国防经费优先考虑当前作战需求,直升机和无人机列入采购重点对象。
7)改革国防部医疗保险制度,扭转开支飙升趋势。

本帖最后由 幻客 于 2010-1-29 10:12 编辑

2012~2017年陆军兵力结构:
40支步兵旅(20 AC and 20 RC)
9-13支斯瑞克旅(8-12 AC and 1 RC)
20-24支重型旅(13-17 AC and 7 RC)
20-21支战斗航空旅(12 - 13 AC and 8 RC)
18个师部(10 AC and 8 RC)
4个军部
总计:73支作战旅,22个作战指挥部

2012~2017年海军兵力结构:
10-11艘航母
        9-10支舰载机联队
84-90艘大型水面战舰,包括19-32艘战舰具备弹道导弹防御能力
14-28艘小型水面战舰(LCS)
29-33艘两栖舰船
51-55艘攻击潜艇
4艘巡航导弹潜艇
3支海上预先部署中队
30-34艘作战后勤船舰
17-24艘指挥和支援船舰,包括JHSV
总计:239-279艘作战舰船,再加上3支海上预先部署中队的14-17艘支援舰船

2012~2017年陆战队兵力结构:
4支陆战师(3 AC and 1 RC)
        11支步兵团
        4支炮兵团

4支陆战航空联队(3 AC and 1 RC)
        13支飞行大队
        8支航控或支援大队

4支陆战后勤大队(3 AC and 1 RC)
        9支战斗后勤团

13支陆战远征单位
        3支陆战远征军
        3支陆战远征旅
        7支陆战远征队

2012~2017年空军兵力结构:
8个情报侦察监视联队标准单元,总计~300战备架飞机和无人机
29个空运和机油联队标准单元,每个单元以33架飞机为准
11-12个战区攻击联队标准单元,每个单元以72架战机为准
5个空优作战联队标准单元,每个单元以72架战机为准
5个远程攻击联队标准单元,总计~96架战备轰炸机
3个指挥控制联队单元,总计~72战备飞机加5个全功能空天作战中心
10支网络和空间联队

2012~2017年特种作战司令部兵力结构:
总计为600-660支排级特种作战部队单元(陆军特战阿尔法小分队,海军海豹排,等)
3-4支陆军游骑兵营
155-157架特种作战飞机和直升机

TOP

本帖最后由 幻客 于 2010-1-29 10:23 编辑

McKeon Fears 2010 QDR To Scale Back 'China Threat'
民主党一向在表面上和中国友好,故麦凯恩有此言,担心奥降低中国威胁(麦就是奥的竞选对手,也是参院军事大佬)。
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4452587



美国采用review而不是plan是基于国会的审核角度进行的。
网址:
http://www.defense.gov/QDR/


草案中对中国的评价有:中短程导弹、巡航导弹、07年反卫星、中国的四代机、购买俄罗斯的地空导弹,这些大家都知道了。
China has begun to articulate new military roles, missions, and capabilities in support of its larger regional and global interests, which could enable it to play a more substantial role in the delivery of international public goods.

The United States welcomes the rise of a strong, prosperous, and successful China that plays a greater role in world affairs.
这句话很献媚,估计老麦就是冲这句话来的。
However, that future is not fixed------这是关键。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

从陆军兵力结构分析:第5军看来是不撤了。至少新增2个斯瑞克旅:第3装甲骑兵团和第1装甲师第1旅改编已成定局。

TOP

本帖最后由 胡佛 于 2010-1-29 08:14 编辑

做个比较,英国防务计划。
附件: 您需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

来看看海军未来5年兵力计划就得出结论,那个313舰计划是没戏了。

TOP

5个空优作战联队标准单元,需要360架(72x5)战备战机库存。F-22A只有186架,其中战备库存只有140-144架左右。这样分析,220架空优战机还得靠F-15。介于F-15C/D存在飞行安全隐患,那么能够长期保留的只有F-15E。也不排除美国空军购买F-15SE,虽然空军领导层一直坚称不会再购买任何四代(国内算三代)战机。

TOP

来看看海军未来5年兵力计划就得出结论,那个313舰计划是没戏了。
幻客 发表于 2010-1-29 10:05


313舰计划是好像在09年改到322了,2011计划草案有242与288之对比,过些时候应该有定论。

年初国会在讨论的3个国防议题:空军F35项目,空军下一代轰炸机项目,海军未来舰队计划。F-35项目已有的消息是换发项目取消,服役推迟。现在就下一代轰炸机项目没有消息,不会是砍掉了吧。

TOP

国会打算从2015年到2022年7年中每年花30亿购买700辆斯瑞克,那就是4900辆了,干啥?所有履带式装甲车全部换成轮式的?

TOP

313计划肯定没戏,海军每年150亿的造船经费得加到200亿才行,但150亿的经费怎么也得加点,原来打算把现在的287艘加到313甚至324,但现在看来30年后287要变为237艘而不是322,整整少了30%。海军只能让上帝保佑维持现状了。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

我们谈论的内容在cbo网站上可下载。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

国会打算从2015年到2022年7年中每年花30亿购买700辆斯瑞克,那就是4900辆了,干啥?所有履带式装甲车全部换成轮式的?
老枪妖客 发表于 2010-1-29 18:27


按照陆军新的作战车辆现代化设想,近万辆现役M113定于今年起退役,不同型号的M113是被相应的斯瑞克、MRAP、布雷德利、GCV型号替代。所以,将来的斯瑞克,特别是斯瑞克A1升级型号,不仅仅是装备斯瑞克旅。重型旅也需要。另外,就是斯瑞克旅数量增加。增加2个斯瑞克旅已经决定了,是否在增加4个现在还不能确定。所以,QDR草案是规定在9-13个旅之间。

TOP

2011财年预算草案还没出,不过有消息说弹道导弹防御专用的CG(X)巡洋舰项目搁置了。
原来设想CG(X)安装大功率反导雷达,体积巨大,需要近20000吨排水量舰体。甚至一度考虑采用核动力GGN(X)。调整后的计划是不可能用这么强大的雷达,但新雷达性能肯定超过现役宙斯盾反导雷达。舰体是选择DDG-51还是DDG-1000似乎还未定局,但前者希望比较大点。
2011财年预算草案还是继续要求C-17A运输机停产以及取消F-35战机备用发动机(F136),这两个项目去年就要求砍,但硬是被国会撑着。
空军自己想砍的项目:E-8预警机发动机升级和C-130运输机航电系统升级,都被五角大楼否决了。这两个还将维持。
另外一个被传言取消的重大项目是三代先进红外预警传感器,这个是作为SBIRS后继准备的。
EFV远征战车命运也将在2月1日揭晓。如果QDR2010要求其存在,那么同日公布的FY2011预算草案就会有拨款。

TOP

请问那个海空一体战是什么意思?

TOP

请问那个海空一体战是什么意思?
mutalisk 发表于 2010-1-30 00:23


空海一体战(Air Sea Battle Concept)是美军正在制定中的一种新策略,这个新理论会在2010QDR得到确认。顾名思义它是海军与空军之间加强合作关系。其目的是应付解放军日益强壮的反介入能力。空海一体战好比当年陆军与空军在冷战后期搞的空地一体战,是军种间战术战役方面的合作。
二炮中程弹道导弹及新装备的攻陆巡航导弹对西太平洋美军形成实际威胁。而东风-25反航母弹道导弹更是被视为挟制美军插手台海的重要手段,这些是美军必须面对的反介入武器与战术挑战。
美国海军攻击力量是以航母载机为主,无论现役FA-18还是将来F-35均存在作战半径短的缺点,迫使航母在战场前沿部署。空海一体战宗旨是有效结合美国空军和海军作战资源,尤其是空中力量。

TOP

313舰计划是好像在09年改到322了,2011计划草案有242与288之对比,过些时候应该有定论。

年初国会在讨论的3个国防议题:空军F35项目,空军下一代轰炸机项目,海军未来舰队计划。F-35项目已有的消息是换发项目 ...
老枪妖客 发表于 2010-1-29 18:21


按照defensenews.com周五新闻,20011预算草案初版对F-35拨款是107亿美元,是当年老美最大宗武器项目,购买数量为42架,但主要开支是用于研发和测试。
远程攻击系统5年内(2011~2015)拨款总额申请为40亿美元,用于现役轰炸机维护、工业基地维持、下一代轰炸机研发、敏捷性全球打击。
美国特种作战司令部得到63亿美元,比上个财政年度增加6%。特种部队兵力增加2800人。
2011预算草案对直升机拨款达到96亿美元,增幅比起本财政年度明显:27亿美元V-22、17亿美元MH-60R/S、14亿美元UH-60、12亿美元CH-47。
海军造舰数量9艘:2艘伯克、2艘弗吉尼亚、2艘LCS、1艘LHA-R、1艘MLP、1艘JHSV。陆军部预算草案承担另1艘JHSV造价。
导弹防御拨款总额99亿美元,其中导弹防御局项目占84亿美元,其余为军种项目。
CG(X)巡洋舰,EP-X电子侦察机、三代红外监视系统被要求取消。没有提及EFV两栖战车,估计是幸存了。

原文在此:www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4475754&c=AME&s=AIR

TOP

《2010四年防务展望》定于2月1日正式公布。
列举一些目前已透露信息:

6)国防经费优先考虑当前作战需求,直升机和无人机列入采购重点对象。

...
幻客 发表于 2010-1-29 01:48


看来陆航的武装侦察直升机(ARH)项目今年会有着落了。不管是用无人机,还是换AH-6”小鸟”都会在今年见分晓了。
严以律己,宽以待人,沉默是金!

TOP

Develop a joint air-sea battle concept. 联合空-海战(空-海一体战)The Air Force and Navy are together developing a new joint air-sea battle concept for defeating adversaries equipped with sophisticated anti-access and area denial capabilities. The concept will address how the joint force will integrate capabilities across all operational domains—air, sea, land, space, and cyberspace—to counter a range of challenges to U.S. freedom of operation. As it matures, the concept will also help to guide the development of future capabilities needed for effective power projection operations.
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

anti-access反介入area denial区域封锁 ,空,海,陆,天,网(从空间概念角度,把电去了)
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

Expand future long-range strike capabilities. In order to increase the long-range striking power of future U.S. forces, the Navy is investigating options for expanding the cruise missile capacity of future Virginia-class attack submarines. It is also slated to conduct field experiments with prototype versions of a naval unmanned combat aerial system (N-UCAS) no later than FY 15. The N-UCAS offers the potential to greatly increase the range of strike aircraft operating from the Navy’s carrier fleet. The Air Force is reviewing options for fielding a penetrating, persistent surveillance and strike aircraft as part of a comprehensive, phased plan to modernize the bomber force. The Navy and the Air Force are cooperatively assessing alternatives for a new joint stand-off attack cruise missile, as well as advanced electronic warfare systems. The Department also plans to experiment with conventional prompt global strike prototypes. Building upon insights developed during the QDR, the Secretary of Defense has ordered a follow-on study to determine what combination of joint persistent surveillance, electronic warfare, and precision-attack capabilities, including both penetrating platforms and stand-off weapons, will be best suited to supporting U.S. power projection operations over the next two to three decades. Findings from that study will inform decisions that shape the FY 2012-17defense program.
Exploit advantages in subsurface operations. The Navy is increasing funding for the development of an unmanned underwater vehicle that will be capable of a wide range of tasks, including coastal ISR and seabed mapping.

Increase the resiliency of base infrastructure. U.S. forces will need networks of bases and supporting infrastructures in key regions that are more resilient than today’s in the face of attacks by a variety of means. Appropriate steps will vary by region but will generally involve combinations of measures, including hardening key facilities against attack, redundancy and dispersal concepts, active defenses, and growing reliance on long-range platforms for ISR and strike.

Assure access to and use of space assets. The Department, through the implementation of priorities from the Space Posture Review, will explore opportunities to leverage growing international and commercial expertise to enhance U.S. capabilities and reduce the vulnerability of space systems and their supporting ground infrastructure. The Department will broaden and deepen relationships with other nations and private firms to create mutually beneficial partnerships to share capabilities, systems, technology, and personnel. Working both bilaterally and multilaterally, the Department will promote spaceflight safety. Air Force investments in space situational awareness will support U.S. efforts by enabling attribution and greater understanding of events in space. Ongoing implementation of the 2008 Space Protection Strategy will reduce vulnerabilities of space systems, and fielding capabilities for rapid augmentation and reconstitution of space capabilities will enhance the overall resiliency of space architectures.

Enhance the robustness of key C4ISR capabilities. In concert with improving the survivability of space systems and infrastructure, U.S. forces will want to field more robust and capable terrestrial and airborne systems to provide critical wartime support functions. In particular, airborne ISR assets must also be made more survivable in order to support operations in heavily defended airspace. The Department is also exploring options for expanding jam-resistant satellite communications and for augmenting these links with long-endurance aerial vehicles that can serve as airborne communications relay platforms.

Defeat enemy sensors and engagement systems. In order to counter the spread of advanced surveillance, air defense, and strike systems, the Department has directed increased investments in selected capabilities for electronic attack.
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

海军研发水下无人任务及侦察船(估计是针对潜艇),基础设施的抗击性,属于USACE的活,空间方面的活很多是blackbudget,由于两次反卫星,美国在此加大力度,faa nasa dhs都有涉及,不仅仅是af自己的事了,
最后一条是很有意思的。说白了就是攻击北斗。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

到底现在老美军方对F35的评价是怎样的,类似空军协会这样的非官方组织又是如何看的?听说后者的评价似乎并不乐观。

TOP

美国国会预算处发布的《2010年国防预算的长期关联》

http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=10852&type=1

TOP

很明显~海空军在收缩、而陆军在扩张!
看来美国的战略目标还是反恐~~

TOP

从911开始,美国的反恐战争已经延续了近10年,看样子再搞一个10年也没啥效果。
这正是中国难得的战略机遇期~这2、30年我们还可以埋头发展、专心解决内部问题!

TOP

从911开始,美国的反恐战争已经延续了近10年,看样子再搞一个10年也没啥效果。
这正是中国难得的战略机遇期~这2、30年我们还可以埋头发展、专心解决内部问题!
白马啸西风 发表于 2010-1-31 18:24

看看迪拜问题是否会在中国发生。战略机遇不等于经济隐患的消失。专心解决是真。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

到底现在老美军方对F35的评价是怎样的,类似空军协会这样的非官方组织又是如何看的?听说后者的评价似乎并不乐观。
yangwenli 发表于 2010-1-30 20:25


F-35是美国未来10年最大武器项目,不但是涉及资金问题,还拉了那么多国家合作,又是奥巴马政府力挺的头等重要项目,光从政治角度考虑撤是不可能的。只是何时装备,装备多少,以及装备何种型号的问题。目前最危险的是海军舰载F-35C型。如果研发推迟,那么势必会迫使F/A-18E/F生产线延长,UCAS-D再成功的话,就很难说了。从现在到2015年,是F-35C关键时刻。错过此窗口,就悬了。

TOP

F-35备用发动机F136是个棘手问题。五角大楼已经连续三年申请取消,硬是给国会撑着。F136存在很遥远的技术成熟化道路。每年对它的数亿美元投资,就等于减少了相应份额对其他领域的投资。

TOP

QDR 2010 and China
By Steeljawscribe, on January 31st, 2010
http://steeljawscribe.com/2010/01/31/qdr-2010-and-china
Tomorrow brings the much anticipated release of the first of three documents of significant import to the US Navy – the QDR for 2010 (Draft-QDR-2010-predecisional).  Language in the draft highlights China as one of several state-actors that have acquired significant anti-access capabilities over the past ten years. Additionally, it points out that:
Chinese military doctrine calls for pre-emptive strikes against an intervening power early in a conflict and places special emphasis on crippling the adversary’s ISR, command and control, and information systems. (draft QDR 2010, p. 32)
The report also notes China’s expanding reach and growing interests abroad, and underscores the need for a two-track approach of engagement and prudent planning:
China’s rapid development of global economic power and political influence, combined with an equally rapid expansion of military capabilities, is one of the central and defining elements of the strategic landscape in the Asian region and, increasingly, global security affairs. China has begun to articulate new military roles, missions, and capabilities in support of its larger regional and global interests, which could enable it to play a more substantial role in the delivery of international public goods. The United States welcomes the rise of a strong, prosperous, and successful China that plays a greater role in world affairs. However, that future is not fixed, and while the United States will seek to maximize positive outcomes and the common benefits that can accrue from cooperation, prudence requires that the United States balance against the possibility that cooperative approaches may fail to prevent disruptive competition and conflict.
The limited transparency of China’s military modernization – in terms of its capabilities, intentions, and investments – remains a source of growing concern in the region, which increases the potential for misunderstanding and miscalculation. Our relationship with China must therefore be multi-dimensional in scope and undergirded by a process of building and deepening strategic trust that seeks to reinforce and expand on areas of mutual interest, while sustaining open channels of communication to discuss sources of friction in the bilateral relationship, and manage and ultimately reduce the risk that is inherent to any relationship as broad and complex as that shared by the United States and China. (draft QDR 2010, p. 53)
This is all well and good, especially in light of writings such as this   which advocates a very Mahanian view of the Chinese Navy and establishment of overseas bases.  Justification, according to the writer, Dr. Shen Dengli  , rests on 4 strategic precepts of China’s overseas interests:
With the continuous expansion of China’s overseas business, the governments are more accountable for protecting the overseas interests. There are four responsibilities: the protection of the people and fortunes overseas; the guarantee of smooth trading; the prevention of the overseas intervention which harms the unity of the country and the defense against foreign invasion. The purpose of the tasks is to deter the threats posed on our legal interests.
Guaranteeing these precepts is a function of a comprehensive approach to power that includes a military with wide-ranging capabilities from defense in close to the ability to strike at the attacker’s homeland.  We see this being accomplished with the previously mentioned anti-access capabilities China is developing to deny the ability of naval and

China's Basing Agreements in the Indian Ocean AOI
air-forces to conduct operations at and inside the first island chain, and at the other extreme, China’s own ongoing nuclear force modernization.  And the navy?
Obviously, navy is crucial in safeguarding the security of the country. When our country’s core interests are harmed, the navy is responsible to conduct retaliatory attack including blocking the enemy’s sea traffic.
Wrapping into a discussion of piracy, the author notes that the concern for overseas bases rests not on piracy issues of Somalia (at the core of the current discussion), but rather a greater threat posed to China’s trade routes:
When the public discusses overseas military bases, they refer to the supply base for the navy escorting the ships cruising in the Gulf of Aden and Somali. The discussion shows people’s enthusiasm in defending the interests of the country. Yet their worries are not the most important reasons for the setup of an overseas military base.
It is true that we are facing the threat posed by terrorism, but different from America, it is not a critical issue. The real threat to us is not posed by the pirates but by the countries which block our trade route. (emphasis added)
The threats also include secessionism outside the Chinese mainland. The situation requires us be able to hit the vulnerable points of our potential opponents by restricting their international waterway. So we need to set up our own blue-water navy and to rely on the overseas military bases to cut the supply costs.
Whom might those countries be?  Obviously the US, especially in the case of the “secessionism” issue (code for the Taiwan issue).  India too is a major consideration and there has been considerable discussion after the TBM shot earlier this month that it was more directed at India than the US.  Of course, India’s announcement toward month’s end of intent to continue with the Agni-III and -IV IRBM and ICBM with language directed at China may have been more than a tacit response as well.  The fact that a considerable portion of China’ overseas routes transit the Indian Ocean, especially those tied to her energy imports from Africa and the MidEast combined with India’s avowed intent to expand her presence and denial capabilities in that region underscores not only China’s security concerns, but those of the US as well.
The implications for US naval forces of a widespread network of overseas bases stems not just from the enabling action provided to Chinese naval forces overseas, but a more subtle one of its relationship to the Chinese maritime reconnaissance strike complex (MRSC).  An MRSC is geared to the near-real time localization and tracking of high value units.  information is fed into the complex from anyone of a number of different nodes – maritime patrol aircraft, satellites (ELINT and IMINT), OTH-R and plain old HUMINT, whether it be from a fishing fleet or a port authority from an overseas base that supports said fleet.  It all feeds into a command and control system that in turn, provides the kind of granular targeting accuracy necessary to employ anti-access weapons such as ASBMs or ASCM carrying subs to counter those forward-deployed naval forces.  This constitutes a direct challenge to one of the four strategic imperatives cited in the QDR, “prevent and deter attack” and specifically to one of the central tenets to that imperative, namely forward-stationed and rotationally deployed U.S. forces.
The past few years there has been a bit of internecine warfare underway between OSD, the Joint Staff, COCOMs and Services over the future direction and composition of forces.  One side has focused on the wars underway in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the more nebulous GWOT and the other on more conventional threats (read: China) and Major Combat Operations, or MCO.  The competition, of course, is over scare resources, be they current forces (and especially those High Demand/Low Density ones like ISR platforms) or funding for future forces.  The release of the 2010 QDR ostensibly settles that dispute in a not-quite Solomonesque way of dividing up focus and direction by first highlighting the need to win the wars we are currently engaged in, but also preventing and deterring more conventional conflict.  The reality of the situation is that the “dog closest to the sled” will get the most attention and focus on threats over the horizon will necessarily blur in the interim.  The inherent danger in such a practice is the strategic space it gives potential adversaries to maneuver and accomplish long-term goals – like establishing overseas bases.  A navy that faces declining numbers and increasing requirements (as of the end of January, over one-half of all ships in the Navy’s inventory were deployed) will be significantly challenged already. Having to face the prospect of an enlarged and robust MRSC will only exacerbate that condition.

TOP

看看迪拜问题是否会在中国发生。战略机遇不等于经济隐患的消失。专心解决是真。
胡佛 发表于 2010-1-31 21:52

中国的经济发展模式不变的话,迪拜式危机的爆发几乎是必然的!
只不过这类危机中国ZF处理起来就“轻车熟路”了~~参考当年朱镕基副总理的手法。
中国经济的最大是靠投资拉动的粗放式经营,而造成这个问题是关键则是ZF职能的错位。

TOP

5个空优作战联队标准单元,需要360架(72x5)战备战机库存。F-22A只有186架,其中战备库存只有140-144架左右。这样分析,220架空优战机还得靠F-15。介于F-15C/D存在飞行安全隐患,那么能够长期保留的只有F-15E。也不 ...
幻客 发表于 2010-1-29 10:20

F-35也可以执行空优任务~~在科索沃F-16就干过这活。

TOP

中国内部问题除了经济还有社会问题~这个才是最大的问题!
经过30年的高速发展,贫富分化是越来越严重了~这直接影响到社会稳定!
搞不好的话,不用人家打进来~我们自己就内乱了!!

TOP

本帖最后由 幻客 于 2010-2-2 02:35 编辑

2010 QDR报告(公开正式版)网址:
http://www.defense.gov/QDR/

文件下载:
http://www.defense.gov/QDR/QDR%20as%20of%2026JAN10%200700.pdf


2010 弹道导弹防御报告(公开正式版)网址:
http://www.defense.gov/bmdr/

文件下载:
http://www.defense.gov/bmdr/BMDR%20as%20of%2026JAN10%200630_for%20web.pdf

TOP

本帖最后由 幻客 于 2010-2-2 10:23 编辑

2011~2015年陆军兵力结构(正式版):
40支步兵旅
8支斯瑞克旅
25支重型旅
21支战斗航空旅
15支爱国者导弹营
7支THAAD导弹连
18个师部
4个军部

2011~2015年海军兵力结构(正式版):
10-11艘航母
        9-10支舰载机联队
84-88艘大型水面战舰,包括21-32艘战舰具备弹道导弹防御能力
14-28艘小型水面战舰,包括LCS,至少有14艘扫雷舰
29-31艘两栖舰船
53-55艘攻击潜艇
4艘巡航导弹潜艇
126-171架陆基ISR与电子作战飞机,包括无人机
3支海上预先部署中队
30-33艘战斗后勤船舰,至少1艘MLP
17-25艘指挥和支援船舰,包括JHSV,3艘T-AKE,1艘MLP
51艘战略运输船

2011~2015年陆战队兵力结构(正式版):
3支陆战远征军
        4支陆战师
                11支步兵团
                4支炮兵团
        4支陆战航空联队
                6支固定翼飞机大队
                7支直升机大队
                4支航控大队
                4支支援大队
        8支航控或支援大队
        4支陆战后勤大队
                9支战斗后勤团
        7支陆战远征队

2011~2015年空军兵力结构(正式版):
8个情报侦察监视联队标准单元,达到380战备架飞机和无人机
30~32个空运和机油联队标准单元,每个单元以33架飞机为准
10-11个战区攻击联队标准单元,每个单元以72架战机为准
6个空优作战联队标准单元,每个单元以72架战机为准
5个远程攻击联队标准单元,达到96架战备轰炸机
3个指挥控制联队单元,5个全能空天作战中心,达到27架战备飞机
10支网络和空间联队

2011~2015年特种作战司令部兵力结构(正式版):
660支班/排级特种作战部队单元(陆军特战阿尔法小分队,海军海豹排,陆战队特种作战小队等)
3支陆军游骑兵营
165架战备特种作战飞机和直升机

TOP

空优联队是6个吧。

TOP

美国国防部正式版中文(简体)总结文件
附件: 您需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?

TOP

需要说明一下,QDR关于美军未来5年的兵力结构,不包括核力量。核力量依据NPR为准。

TOP

2010版四年国土安全展望(QHSR)文件下载地址:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/qhsr_report.pdf

TOP

長知識啊,謝啦

TOP

好是好,但是就是翻译困难

TOP

返回列表