返回列表 发帖

旅战斗队2010

本帖最后由 胡佛 于 2011-1-9 07:32 编辑

找了很久,终于找到。暂时设个权限。
请老枪兄弟及时翻阅。
附件: 您需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

胡佛兄,同是天涯沦落人,相逢何必曾相识,你就解除权限吧,让大伙一起围观一下

TOP

2010版的BCT手册形同鸡肋!

里面删减了很多内容,特别是编制图表,编制隶属关系只能准确到连一级,再也无法像过去一样可以查阅到班、单兵了。

BCT增加了很多职能,体现了“全频谱作战”思想。

可惜了附录。
严以律己,宽以待人,沉默是金!

TOP

看看说明,毕竟是个旅级手册,下面的合成营还有手册,这才能保持一致。附录给砍了是很可惜,所以以前的fmi还是有用的。
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

下载,学习,对各位大大的学识佩服至极。

TOP

感谢胡局!

TOP

同找,谢谢!

TOP

有个疑问:SBCT相对IBCT和HBCT,人数多编制相对复杂但不设副旅长。出于何种考虑?美军传统在旅团一级没有副指挥官职,指挥官之后为参谋长性质的执行官。HBCT和IBCT却增设副旅长,这又是为何呢。

TOP

分析了一下,HBCT和IBCT是传统任务旅,DCO(副旅长)负责非致命目标,XO则是致命目标定位。
又一个问题:非致命目标和非致命武器的关系是什么?
Justice is the greatest good 正义是最大的善
Injustice is the greatest evil 不公是最大的恶

TOP

太好了!

TOP

这个战地手册号码不是重型旅战斗队的吗?三型部队作战指挥是有许多共同处,可以合并到一本写,但也有不少不同之处啊,这手册怎么没有分别说明。

TOP

谢谢分蘖!

TOP

找很久了,太感谢楼主了,能不能告诉我在哪下载的,最好能有兵种合成营的!

TOP

找很久了,太感谢楼主了,能不能告诉我在哪下载的,最好能有兵种合成营的!

TOP

有组织翻译的,可算我一个QQ:363277859

TOP

赞美一把,谢谢!

TOP

感谢,学习后,再和各位讨论

TOP

Army BCT Modernization Alters Course
U/UGS, T/UGS and the 'Flying Beer Keg' are dead, SUGV and NIK survive

U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization (BCTM) has embarked on a different path following the results of a mid-January Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) review, which was formalized in a subsequent Acquisition Decision Memorandum signed on Feb. 3, 2011. The new path significantly alters the earlier course established for the Early-Infantry Brigade combat Team (E-IBCT) activities underway at Ft. Bliss / White Sands Missile Range.

According to a Feb. 4,  2011 release from Department of the Army, the service “announced today that it decided to continue low-rate initial production of two elements of the Early-Infantry Brigade Combat Team (E-IBCT) program — the Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle and tactical network system [Network Integration Kit (NIK)].  The E-IBCT investment of network technologies and software provide a foundation for growth of the Army’s tactical network.”

“The Army will no longer pursue the Unattended Ground Sensors and the Class 1 Unmanned Air System elements of the program,” the announcement read. “The Army will transition the procurement of small unmanned ground vehicles and tactical network systems to program executive offices with primary responsibility for these systems” [See “Army Solidifies UGV Commitment,” posted Jan. 21, 2011].

Paul Mehney, spokesman for the Army modernization effort, offered, “The most logical question is, not only what did the Army get for its investment in the FCS network, but also in the E-IBCT effort? And there are three key things that I want to point out that will factor into the larger network strategy.

“First, the E-IBCT investment provided the infrastructure that will allow the Army to grow the tactical network capability,” he began. “That capability is increasingly requiring an agile and iterative acquisition approach. So all of that investment allowed you to get to the foundation that can be built upon.

“Second, what we got out of this was soldier feedback that said transferring sensor data is fine. Being able to share pictures is fine. But what the user really validated was, still pushing the connectivity down to the soldier level and the ability to ‘collaborate’ information – white board, chat, voice messaging, etcetera – and to be able to do that from the soldier up and from the higher echelon back down. That was validated as being the key to what we are now terming the ‘tactical network edge’ – down to that soldier level.”

According to Mehney, the third important payoff from FCS and E-IBCT is that the investment has helped provide opportunities for industry of all sizes to participate in the Army’s tactical network strategy.

“So what you are now beginning to see come out of this and come on line is a foundation that enables network architectural growth, particularly in three categories,” he said. “First, you now have backbone waveforms – specifically WNW, SRW, and legacy – including SINCGARS voice – that are non-proprietary and will be available for people to plug them into systems they are developing. Second, we are moving toward a common operating environment/common computing environment – open architecture and non-proprietary – that people can plug into. Now industry will have a standard that they can build to, both in waveforms and a common operating environment. And that common operating environment will come on line in the next couple months. Third, all of that allows for the launch of a non-proprietary and competitive business approach to support network ‘Capability Set’ development.

“So, the emerging tactical network strategy that is coming out of the G3/5/7 LANDWARNET office – which is what we are going to be ‘building to’ and ‘evaluating to’ – now has an emphasis on delivering capability down to the soldier level and. Most importantly, to synchronize that with the maturing Army Forces Generation (ARFORGEN) process. And the way we are going to do that is to begin to formulate iterative network ‘capability sets’ on a two year basis – and now that we have the foundation built we can do this – to develop, evaluate, test and field [enhanced capabilities] prior to deployment.”

By comparison, he characterized the infusion of network technologies into theater now as “more of an ad hoc basis.”

“The need for capabilities comes up; we find a solution; we get it to theater,” he observed. “Well, guess where the integration work takes place [under that model]? In theater. So now, with this emerging strategy, and the acquisition strategy supporting it, we are dedicating a ‘full brigade’ to test, evaluate, integrate, and develop doctrine to support these capability sets.”

That “full brigade” is 2nd Brigade. 1st Armor Division (2/1 AD). Unlike the former “partial brigade” design of 5th brigade / 1st Armor Division (5/1 AD) Army Evaluation Task Force (AETF), 2/1 AD is described as “a full brigade” of “4,000+ soldiers” that includes light, heavy, and Stryker components [Note: 5/1 AD was recently “reflagged” as 2/1 AD, maintaining the same commander and many of the same key command personnel].

“So you now have a 4,000-man ‘plus’ brigade that is going to be dedicated to doing tactical network integration and doctrine,” he said. “That process is starting this year and we are now aligning the programs of record to deployment schedules and the ARFORGEN process.”

Under the new structure, the first “capability set” that the Army is seeking to support is CS 2013-2014 (CS 13-14).

“The capabilities that will be integrated, evaluated and fielded to that set are going to go through a series of tests and evaluations in 2011 ad 2012,” Mehney explained. “The next set, which will be a ‘stronger set,’ will be CS 15-16. For that set, we are going to begin to take a look at what will go in it, we will be reaching out to industry, Army laboratories, and academia. We are going to see what’s out there. You are going to see some Broad Agency Announcements and proposal requests coming out in the next couple of months to fill capability gaps for those capability sets. Then we are going to start to evaluate that technology, both in the R&D base and the acquisition base. Then, what proves out we will get down there to the AETF as part of the Brigade Combat Team ‘integration exercises.’  And those exercises will be the evaluation points that will help form those future capability sets.”

TOP

一级无人机和无人照应地面传感器取消了。小型无人车和车载网络组建不再准备全军推广,成为试点项目。

TOP

一级无人机本来就和大乌鸦功能重复,取消也好

TOP

一级无人机还是有所特色的,它是垂直起降,可以在空中停滞监视目标,传感器运用与固定翼的大乌鸦并无一致。一级无人机问题在于噪音过高,容易被敌方发觉。

TOP

一级无人机和无人照应地面传感器取消了。小型无人车和车载网络组建不再准备全军推广,成为试点项目。
幻客 发表于 2011-2-11 01:35


感觉FCS的遗产是越砍越多啊,都没剩多少了。

TOP

战术网不但没砍,而且在不断进化发展,这才是FCS精髓所在,其他系统无非就是平台而已。

TOP

无人车取消的原因是什么?

TOP

无人机部分没有完全取消。SUGV不是装备了吗。

TOP

战术网不但没砍,而且在不断进化发展,这才是FCS精髓所在,其他系统无非就是平台而已。
幻客 发表于 2011-2-12 01:48


FCS网络列装美军了吗   哪个部队首先装备

TOP

FCS网络列装美军了吗   哪个部队首先装备
美国及其盟国 发表于 2011-2-12 23:42


第1装甲师第2步兵旅战斗队。该旅还取代了第1装甲师第5旅成为试验新装备的陆军评估特遣部队(AETF)。

TOP

下载学习学习,感谢

TOP

感谢了,看看

TOP

相逢何必曾相识,你就解除权限吧,

TOP

这个不错。

TOP

返回列表