返回列表 发帖

NAVY打算给SM2装主动头了?那SM6咋办?

USN plans active seeker refit for SM-2 missile

Richard Scott, London
- IHS Jane's Missiles & Rockets

The US Navy (USN) plans to introduce an active radar seeker into the Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) family as part of upgrade and obsolescence mitigation programme intended to maintain the effectiveness of SM-2 into the 2030s.

This move comes alongside activity to re-start SM-2 all-up-round (AUR) production in fiscal year (FY) 2017 to meet international customer demand through Foreign Military Sales (FMS).

Although the USN ceased procurement of new SM-2 missiles after its FY 2011 buy, the service expects to maintain the weapon in inventory for at least another 20 years. Under the FY 2017 budget plan, initial funding has been earmarked for SM-2 improvement requirements definition and risk reduction work.

The SM-2 missile family currently uses semi-active radar homing, requiring illuminator support to illuminate the target in the terminal phase of an engagement. Speaking at the IQ Defence Naval Combat Systems Conference in London, US Navy Captain Michael Ladner, Major Program Manager, Surface Ship Weapons (IWS 3.0) in the Naval Sea Systems Command's Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS), confirmed that the SM-2 improvement programme "will put an active seeker in the front-end of SM-2".

Explaining the move, he continued, "As the threat and the density of raids continue to get higher and closer, there are inherent limitations on semi-active capability. So in 2017 we're going to start an obsolescence improvement programme on Standard Missile-2 that is going to do a whole bunch of things. But the big change is that we're going to put an active seeker in the front end.

"That active [seeker] capability will allow [SM-2] to pace the threat going forward.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


不是已经有了标准6了么? 老标2还装个主动雷达头干嘛?这算把SM6往哪儿搁?

SM2BlockIIIA/B性能与SM2BlockIV相比, 究竟差在何处呢?

TOP

这能差多少?

TOP

不知DDG1000的垂发一个坑能放下几枚SM3BlockII? 它那个垂发的尺寸一直让人很费解。

TOP

MK57 VLS 一个坑能装多少TLAM呢?

另外ESSM似乎也有安装主动导引头的计划?

TOP

标准2blockiiiB本来就有主动导引模式的? 没听说过呃... 有网上啥资料么?

如果是红外制导, 那么也是被动制导, 不是主动.

TOP

那么现在看来Mk57不太可能装备除DDg1000之外的其他舰艇啰。尺寸实在太奇怪了。

TOP

应该是误传。除了ESSM可以quadpack四联装,其他型号导弹都是一个发射单元装一枚。
幻客 发表于 2016-7-16 20:26



既然这样其装载量和现有的Mk41一样, 那何必弄个新的Mk57呢?Mk41已经这么成熟.

TOP

SM2加了主动制导头以后, 会有CEC能力吗?

TOP

TPY-2雷达探测范围能超过二千公里么?啥目标2000km外就能探测到?

TOP

楼歪了耶,我只想讨论SM2和Mk57的…

TOP

红外成像就是主动红外?   怎么个主动法? 导引头发射红外线么?否则怎么主动?

无论成像还是单点/多点的红外/紫外导引头, 都是被动导引头, 依靠搜索目标自身发射的红外线/紫外线进行跟踪导引.

俺还没有听说过SM2装备红外成像制导头的报道. 哪位有滴话请分享.

TOP

嗯,确实缺乏讨论基础。

这俩凡是你发明的?

非成像的红外/紫外导引头是被动的还是主动,按您这理论?

标准SM2装红外成像制导头的消息俺确实没搜到,哪位能帮忙给个链接?

TOP

本帖最后由 @独孤求胜 于 2016-7-24 09:32 编辑

说岔了。我指的是制导头本身,不是整个引导方式。不讨论了越岔越远。

我对装红外成像制导头的SM2更感兴趣,刚刚又搜了一下,看到SM2 BlockIV A 似乎装IR试验过。只是不晓得这个IR是否红外成像,是否已经定型服役?好像没有。

这样一来SM6是否也会考虑增加红外制导能力?

TOP

标二的3型就有双波段红外成像? 没听说呢. 只知道SM2 BlockIV A试图装来着, 而且试验很成功, 但最终没结果了.

TOP

SM-2BlockIVA因为预算严重超出被砍掉,现在的SM-6就是其替代品。SM-6可以承担弹道导弹末端防御任务。
幻客 发表于 2016-7-28 21:55



SM6有IR seeker吗?

TOP

返回列表